I don't plan on making any changes until there is consensus among all the interested parties as to what exactly needs to change. I think the latter is used more and is potentially less accidentally destructive. Therefore, add to top and bottom are both separately useful.Īlso, I'm not sure that load/replace should be the default as opposed to load/append. this at least when it came to adding cheatcodes - this feels way too overcomplicated with how I have to add a cheat to the bottom or the the cheat index is irrelevant for the emu-handled cheats, but for the new RA-handled cheats they are potentially used because there are options to do things like "run next cheat if " which will look at the next cheat in the list. Can we make this more accessible yet still have all the additional functionality for the poweruser? I liked how things were before vs. Your average enduser has no idea how to add cheatcodes now. So if you select it, you can still see the cheats you added. There is only 'Delete All Cheats', and this doesn't even refresh the list.Not sure of how to do it but there has to be a way to make this less cluttered. This all needs to be made way less cluttered. These are the ONLY options to adding new cheats as opposed to the cheat passes option. There is 'Add Cheat to Bottom/Add Cheat To Top'.Why is it gone all of a sudden? I don't like this at all. Where is the cheat passes option? This made adding new cheats easy. Maybe with some alterations we can reduce the barrier to entry here. I only noticed this when a user alerted me to this -Īdding cheatcodes is now way too overcomplicated I'm afraid to say.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |